RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05892
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Re-entry (RE) code of 2X (1st Term, 2nd Term or Career AMN
Not Selected under Selection Retention Process (SRP)) be changed
to 1J (Eligible To Reenlist-Elected Separation Or Discharge.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His commander stated that he failed to keep his mobility
requirement up to date because his passport expired. There were
24 other passports within the section that had the same problem
but he was singled out and denied reenlistment.
In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of Copy
1 and 4 of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty, his memorandum in response to denial of
reenlistment, several letters of character statements, an AMC
Form 196, Aircraft Commanders Report on Crew Member, and his AF
Form 910s, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt) dated
16 Jan 2008 thru 15 Jan 2009, and 16 Jan 2009 thru 28 May 2009.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 July 2002
and was released on 30 June 2010 with an honorable
characterization of service and was credited with 7 years, 11
months, and 29 days of active duty service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application
extracted from the applicants military personnel records are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force
office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C.
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
1. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant
had a history of disciplinary infractions and did not provide
any proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code.
The applicant's supervisor non-recommended him on an AF IMT 418,
Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, on 23 March 2010,
and his commander non-selected him on 23 March 2010 citing three
letters of reprimand. In addition to the three disciplinary
infractions the applicant received an Article 15 for getting
cash with his government charge card for non-government uses on
his previous enlistment. The applicant acknowledged his non-
selection on 23 March 2010. He appealed the decision on
26 March 2010. The appeal was denied on 11 June 2010 and the
applicant acknowledged the denial on 15 June 2010. The
applicant was released from active duty on 30 June 2010 under
the fiscal year (FY) 2010 AF Force Shaping Rollback Program with
$10,895.55 in separation pay.
2. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders
have selective reenlistment selection or nonselection authority.
The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members
enlisted performance report (EPR) ratings, unfavorable
information from any substantiated source, the airman's
willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the
airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty
performance levels.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 17 February 2013 for review and comment within
30 days. To date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 17 October 2013, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2012-05892:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 12 Dec 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 11 Feb 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 2013.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02296
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in regards to his non-selection for reenlistment. Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05487
Block 8b, Station Where Separated, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, instead of Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. The applicants commander indicated the applicant identified himself as eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback program and it was his intention to deny the applicant reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04867
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP) be changed to allow him to reenlist. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02787 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to allow his reentry into the military. On 17 Feb 2011, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01348
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01348 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)," be changed to 1XY [sic] to allow his reentry into the military. On 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00009
The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 24 Jan 14, for a period of three years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial with respect to the applicants request for his lost time to be reinstated. A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02577
DPSOS states the DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code JBK (less than 6 years of active service) or LBK (more than 6 years of active service) with a corresponding narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service since the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as in the applicants case, the DOS/ETS may be involuntarily accelerated. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...